ESA By States
ESA Laws
Pricing
Resources
7 min read
You finally found the perfect rental property, but the landlord says your companion can’t stay. That heartbreaking news can rapidly turn into stress, disrupted treatment, and even housing instability.
Under federal law, a valid ESA letter can unlock reasonable accommodations, allowing you to live where you need to live, hassle-free.
Below, we’ll break down when landlords can (and can’t) say no, what documentation works, and the exact steps to take if your ESA request is denied.
Let’s dive in!
Most housing providers must grant reasonable accommodations for assistance animals, including ESAs. But the Fair Housing Act (FHA) allows limited, fact-specific denials. Think of these as exceptions that must be supported by objective evidence, not just intuition.
If your “documentation” is a generic certificate or registration purchased online, with no therapeutic relationship or professional license, the landlord can question its reliability.
HUD says documentation should come from a health care professional who has personal knowledge of your disability-related need. Telehealth is fine when there’s a genuine provider–patient relationship.
Providers may deny if the specific animal (not the species or breed) poses a direct threat to others’ health or safety that can’t be reduced by reasonable steps (e.g., training, leashing). This must be an individualized assessment grounded in verified information, not speculation.
If the animal has caused, or is likely to cause, substantial damage to the property and the risk can’t be mitigated, the request can be refused.
Apart from denial, landlords can charge you for actual damage if they penalize all tenants for damage. However, they cannot impose a pet deposit or pet rent for ESAs.
Persistent, documented noise that significantly interferes with others’ routine and enjoyment, even after you’ve had the chance to correct it, can support denial or lease enforcement. The key is evidence-based, individualized assessment (not stereotypes).
If accommodating the animal would impose an unnecessary economic and administrative burden on the housing provider and no effective alternative exists, denial may be justified. Providers should engage in the interactive process to explore alternatives first.
If allowing the ESA would fundamentally alter the landlord’s operations (e.g., require a wholesale change to residential services), the landlord can say no without any hesitation.
Some housing isn’t covered, for example, owner-occupied buildings with four or fewer units, and certain single-family homes rented without a broker. In such cases, your buddy can’t be allowed to stay with you.
Breed or size limits can’t be used to deny an ESA based solely on policy. However, a provider may refuse a particular animal whose behavior creates an undeniable direct threat or significant damage risk.
A request can be denied when there’s no link between the disability and the assistance the animal provides. For instance, if the documentation doesn’t specify a physical condition or explain how the animal helps its owner.
“Too big for the unit” isn’t, by itself, a lawful reason. But if accommodating a very large specific animal would create an unwanted burden (e.g., serious structural concerns) and no reasonable alternative exists, denial may be permissible after an interactive dialogue.
Where possession of a particular species is illegal under state or local law, a housing provider generally isn’t required to grant an accommodation that would violate the law.
Always check local requirements in addition to federal fair housing standards. A general legal principle would be to pair with HUD’s overall framework on undue burden/fundamental alteration.
Tenants remain responsible for feeding, maintaining, providing veterinary care, and controlling the emotional support animal. Repeated failure to meet reasonable conduct rules (e.g., sanitation, control) can justify lease enforcement or denial.
Even strict “no pets” buildings must consider assistance animals differently. Under federal law, ESAs are not pets; they are part of reasonable accommodation rights.
The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) makes clear that legal protections for emotional support animals apply when the need is documented and no exception (threat, undue burden, etc.) applies.
A blanket “no pets” rule cannot be used to refuse a properly supported ESA accommodation. ESAs are free from pet rules and regulations.
When you provide reliable documentation from someone who can write an ESA letter, like a licensed mental health professional (LMHP) who knows your condition and needs. Landlords cannot deny your ESA based solely on skepticism or personal preferences.
Disliking animals, fears, or generalized concerns don’t count. Decisions must be individualized and evidence-based, not rooted in bias.
Guessing that an animal “might” bite or “could” bark is not enough. Landlords need reliable, objective evidence tied to the specific animal; otherwise, they can’t reject it.
Weight limits or breed charts don’t apply to ESAs. Evaluation centers on the particular animal’s conduct and whether any risk can be mitigated.
Under emotional support animal laws enforced through the FHA (and, where applicable, Section 504/ADA in certain public or government-run housing contexts), tenants may request leniency in rules that are necessary to use and enjoy their home.
Common, lawful requests include:
Yes, sometimes, but only in narrow, documented circumstances. A landlord may deny an ESA letter if the documentation isn’t reliable. For example, a “registration” with no clinician relationship, or a letter that fails to establish disability and need.
A strong ESA letter should include:
Check out this sample ESA letter for reference!
If you believe the denial doesn’t fit the lawful exceptions, take these steps:
Ask for an interactive meeting. Offer solutions (training, leashing, waste plan) that address concerns without undermining your accommodation.
You can file a discrimination complaint with HUD’s Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity (FHEO). You generally must file within one year of the last discriminatory act.
Update your ESA letter with your licensed mental health professional, making sure it clearly ties your disability to the ESA’s support and reflects a real provider–patient relationship.
You may also bring a private lawsuit under the FHA, typically within two years (administrative filings can affect timing). An attorney or local fair housing group can advise on strategy.
Document all communications and deadlines. HUD investigations are designed to move quickly, and timely action preserves your options for legal action.
Landlords cannot deny legitimate ESA accommodations based solely on a “no-pets” policy, breed/size rules, or personal discomfort.
Denials are allowed only when the specific animal presents a verified threat to health or safety, would cause significant damage that can’t be mitigated, or when an accommodation creates an undue burden or fundamental alteration.
Knowing your rights and bringing the right documentation keeps you squarely within the legal protections for emotional support animals under federal law.
If you’re ready to move forward with confidence, consider trying RealESALetter.com to obtain a compliant ESA letter from a qualified clinician the right way. Bring calm and your loved companion home with ease!
A landlord generally cannot deny an ESA solely because of allergies, especially if the request is reasonable and backed by proper documentation. However, if the allergies pose a serious health risk to others (like roommates or building staff), they may try to find a workable compromise.
A landlord cannot legally deny an ESA dog solely based on its breed, as breed restrictions do not apply to emotional support animals under the Fair Housing Act. However, they can deny the animal if it poses a direct threat to others or causes significant property damage.
An ESA letter helps, but it’s not an automatic “yes.” A landlord may deny if the documentation isn’t reliable (e.g., generic online “registrations”) or fails to show a disability-related need. Also, if the specific animal poses a direct threat or accommodation would be an undue burden, even in that case, the letter alone can’t do anything.
There’s no arbitrary number, but you may be asked to show that each animal is necessary for your disability. HUD notes requests can involve more than one animal. Providers then assess reasonableness and any undue burden on a case-by-case basis.
No! Landlords or housing providers may not charge pet fees, pet deposits, or pet rent for ESAs because assistance animals aren’t “pets.” They may, however, recover costs for actual damage if that’s their standard practice for all tenants.
If your landlord refuses to accept your emotional support animal, start by requesting their denial in writing along with the specific reasons. Then, review your ESA letter for accuracy, address any valid concerns they raise, and respond by clearly stating your legal rights. If they remain unreasonable, you can file a complaint with HUD for potential discrimination.
WRITTEN BY
Harper Jefcoat
Harper Jefcoat is a dedicated pet enthusiast and esteemed author at RealESALetter.com. With a profound passion for animals, Harper combines extensive knowledge and personal experience to provide insightful and informative content. Specializing in canine behavior and wellness, he strives to empower pet owners with the tools and understanding they need to nurture and care for their furry friends effectively. Harper’s writings reflect his commitment to enhancing the lives of pets and their owners, making him a trusted voice in the pet community.
Share this Article
Your password has been sent to
